| Author | Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) | 
      
      
        |  Lloyd Roses
 Artificial Memories
 
 1173
 
 
       | Posted - 2015.07.01 14:10:04 -
          [1] - Quote 
 
 elitatwo wrote:afkalt wrote:d) This thread is long abandoned and they don't care and the never not nerf caldari train continues unmolested. e) those responsible for desicion making went on the summer holidays and read the forums for entertaining only, indirectly mocking us for even trying. 
 600 eyes though see more than 12, atleast regarding possible issues and complications that arise. Want to impose that is the main benefit of those threads, remember the sabre with 10AU/s warpspeed before the spacebreak changes, when that bubble went up before the DIC was on your overview.
 | 
      
      
        |  Lloyd Roses
 Artificial Memories
 
 1176
 
 
       | Posted - 2015.07.01 22:04:04 -
          [2] - Quote 
 
 Jeremiah Saken wrote:Fourteen Maken wrote: We can blame Rise and Fozzie but the buck stops with Ytterbuim, even if he's not the one driving the agenda he should at least have stepped in to make changes before now.  I don't know how is their key to balance ships. For example proposal change to Tempest hull. Ok I don't fly it, don't know in what place it is. So now we will have some change to BS hull, so what? 
 The Tempest never was a truly bad choice in a cruiser meta simply for having 2 heavy neuts while not being that slow. Just put any cruiser/BC next to a tempest in pointrange and see the cap drained. However the dps has been so anemic at 20k you'd usually be just better off flying a geddon, which also neuts, but has rapid heavies and drones. Some traits next to each other: Tempest got more dps, goes a bit faster, the geddon has longer range on the neuts and can choose from light to heavy drones. So the geddon isn't flat-out better at a tempest's job.
 | 
      
      
        |  Lloyd Roses
 Artificial Memories
 
 1217
 
 
       | Posted - 2015.07.23 11:02:13 -
          [3] - Quote 
 
 elitatwo wrote:Oceans later missile application became the running gag that never got old.
 
 
 I never got that part. Some three years ago, I started a dedicated missile alt because that comment seemed fishy even back then. Like 2 months in on that toon, missiles struck me as bonkers/OP and I trained for a tengu (since I had the linkalt anyways). So excuse me if my opinions on missiles diverge from yours.
 
 Fighting a turretboat in a sabre, I can get under the guns most of the time. Fighting a HML boat, I just can't. He's not dumb, so he loads precisions and even when you're in a small vessel they do hurt. A lot. Significantly more than the cruiser with OP turrets that just can't apply any damage.
 
 Surely you've also had moments where you've shot down bombers and sabres with a cruise raven that didn't have anything fitted to enhance tracking, show me the 1400mm artillery ship that does the same.
 
 | 
      
        |  |  |